I've only recently joined this fan site, although I had posted some forum postings earlier on the matrix-explained site before that forum became
unusable and destroyed by huge amounts of spam. It's cool to see that some of the original forum
posters have come back to this new site.
I really like the idea of creating some sort of knowledge database of the matrix films, particularly because there still seems to be a lot of confusion on the films and in the way the W's meant their movie to be interpreted.
I'd really like to add some contributions to the matrix discussion once it gets underway. I'm not sure whether this
privilege is only reserved for those who have posted many forum postings in the past and have proven their level of knowledge of the films. Although I have not had many postings in the past, I feel that I can give a meaningful contribution to the knowledge database, particularly because I'm currently working on my own website in which the movies are analysed and interpreted from a large range of perspectives.
My position is that particular scenes in the movie cannot be interpreted correctly without the appropriate framework for reference. Sure, we create a factual sheet, but 'fact' as well as 'truth' are
relative concepts. In order to be able to speak about 'absolute fact' or 'objective truth', we would need to define the framework in which particular scenes are interpreted and analysed. Sound confusing? Let me explain with an example.
One of the most confusing scenes for me was the whole Mobil Ave scene. In the beginning, I just couldn't understand why the directors would have Neo end up in an
abandoned train station called Mobil Ave. I also couldn't understand what this place symbolized in terms of of Neo's Journey. Sure, it was easy enough to discover the
anagram for Limbo, but, for me, it wasn't enough. I also had the feeling that, although I could come to see this place symbolising some form of 'purgatory', I felt there was still a lot of symbolism that I was still missing. Having delved into literature, mythologym, and religion, I have come to see Mobil Ave as representing and symbolising so much more.
From a perspective of Christianity, Movil Ave could indeed be seen as 'a place of purgatory located on the edge of hell' (= the very
definition of Limbo). This, in fact, is quite a nice interpretation because it ties into Trinity's descent into club hel (which, in turn, could quite easily be interpreted as symbolising Hell as known and described in christianity). Mobil Ave, in this sense, would indeed seem to border on the 'edge of Hell'.
Seen from the perspective of the Hero's Journey (Joseph Campbell), Mobil Ave can be thought of as representing Neo's 'Refusal of the Return'. This also ties in neatly with the 'place of purgatory'
interpretation from Christianity.
Seen from the perspective of the philosophy of Nietzsche, and in particular, his thesis on the Ubermensch, Mobil Ave becomes something quite different altogether. If we see Neo's Journey as his becoming Ubermensch, we can come to see Mobil Ave as representing his halfway point. In this case, Mobil Ave can be interpreted as symbolising Neo's halfway point, or his being caught "between
beast and Ubermensch".
Seen from the perspective of Plato's Allegory of the Cave, Mobil Ave can be interpreted as symbolising 'the
divided line' between the visible world (= the matrix) and the intelligible world (= machine city).
And yet, if we view Mobil Ave from a gnostic perspective, it also represents a place of purgatory, but one where "the world spirit in exile must go through the inferno of matter and the purgatory of
ethics to arrive at the spiritual paradise" (= the explanation of Limbo in Gnosticism). If we see Neo as the world-spirit (= neo as the one), and Mobil Ave as the "purgatory of ethics", we can even come to see Bane as representing the "Inferno of Matter" and machine city as representing the "spiritual paradise".
From a Buddhist perspective, Mobil Ave can be
viewed as representing one of the six realms on the wheel of Samsara. If we can come to see Neo's Journey as his journey through each of the six realms of Samsara, then we can think of Mobil Ave/Club Hel as representing the Hell Realm. In Buddhism, and within the Hell Realm, a distinction is usually made between hot hells and cold hells. In this case the cold hell is represented by Mobil Ave and the hot hell by Club Hel. I believe it is no coincidence that the scenes are intercut between Mobil Ave and Club Hel, since they both represent one and the same realm of Samsara.
From a
Hindu perspective, Mobil Ave can also be viewed as representing one of the seven Chakra's. If one can see Neo's journey as his journey through each of the seven chakra's, then Mobil Ave can be thought of as the chakra of vishuddha. In fact, the description of this
chakra fits the setting of Mobil Ave very well indeed.
I could go on and on, but my point is that it becomes very difficult to talk about the 'true interpretation' or the 'only explanation' without an appropriate framework for analysis/interpretation.
So, the only answer to the question "what is Mobil Ave?" can really be "well, it depends on what perspective you're looking from".
I believe such an approach is not only more efficient (because it
saves a lot of nitpicking), I believe it is also appropriate given the large range and diversity of references that we see in the films. It would be a waste to
exclude a large range of interpretations or perspectives in the
idle hope of getting an singularly coherent explanation of the films. I believe there is no singularly coherent framework for analysis/interpretation and that is why we should specify the perspective from which we are conducting our analysis.
Any thoughts, anyone?